The Ambiguity regarding Electronic Medical Records
Even though we might feel that electronic medical records can only be a positive advancement in a modern human society, knowing how useful electronic data is today and how easy it is to handle it, these are the same reasons why this can be a dangerous thing. All in all, this is a matter of controversy since there are people who are greatly for this medical metamorphosis, while, at the same time, there are those who do not desire this evolution, claiming that it will prove to be counter-production. Many of positive and negative aspects of having electronic medical records will be listed and explained below.
Pros and Cons regarding Electronic Medical Records
The first, obvious advantage would be the preservation of space. Namely, having all the necessary papers in digital form, all the data would not take up as much space as regular papers would. On the contrary, millions of different records would be kept on a single hard drive or other digital memory unit. This would help hospitals and other medical facilities have more room for treating patients instead of keeping medical records which can take up quite some space. Apart from being useful for people, this method will be useful for the preservation of nature.
Secondly, corresponding and feedback between health experts can be made easier this way. Doctors can easily exchange the electronic medical records of their patients and, thereby, know what the previous specialist had done and which approaches had he/she used on the patient. This way, there can be no therapy overlapping or dangerous combination of medicine, since all sides will have insight on the situation. Moreover, these kinds of records offer instant access time and are available to doctors at any given time.
Next, comes the handwriting. We have all been exposed to illegible scribbles of doctors in a rush. These are quite hard to decipher. However, if these pieces of data were typed beforehand, reading and understanding would be quite easy. Yet, this method has a trick, since many doctors do not know fast typing, or even handling computers. For them, this change would be hard and would request a lot of effort.
This is one of the main flaws of this constructive medical change. A vast majority of people employed in the branch of medicine, know little about computers and technology, making it hard for them to focus on it and treat patients at the same time. Thus, courses would need to be held if the doctors are to be capable of understanding the manner of conduct adequate software requirements.
Also, using different programs from one medical facility to another can make the correspondence mentioned above quite hard due to the lack of compatibility. Finally, there is the danger of stolen data, or misused medical records since many hackers may have interest in this kind of information.